Skip to content
Vision Global Magazine

Tetris Wouldn't Triumph at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Might Solve This

Each time a significant prize-giving event nears, one notices a clamor to include of new categories to recognize underappreciated efforts and fill the hearts of fans dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator has already made supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. So would strategy board titles, this being a dedicated supporter's campaign. However, I must insist for pushing forward just as with other blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand stands as crucial and significant. This is the request: We need an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Categorizing art by genre is not a science; it’s very subjective, and typically start arguments and end in fuzzy definitions. There’s a reason film award organizations avoid this approach. Yet it remains a necessary evil in the world of interactive entertainment, that demonstrate such variety it's challenging to consider them one unified medium.

To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to compete fairly, genre categories are essential.

Present Award Structure

Prominent interactive entertainment events offer these classifications covering Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Together, these six categories actually cover numerous genres, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

Not so for logic-based experiences. No suitable classification appears to put them. Think about these this year’s best games, all very different: the architectural riddles in a particular game, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. What category would fit them within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

Acknowledgment Issues

Many instances occur excellent brain-teasers published annually that have no home at major award shows, except when they manage to fit for categories like Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested small studio competitions.

  • One classic puzzle game wasn’t nominated in any category during that awards season
  • A different innovative game received no nominations that year
  • Popular arranging title got ignored recently
  • Just some brain-teasers scraped into small studio or handheld classifications

Significance of Puzzle Games

Frequently they represent compact experiences, yet the craft of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Famous handheld logic titles rank among most engaged experiences in the world maintaining this status for over a decade.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with well-known building titles claiming status as best-selling game of all time; it additionally competes for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, and they are in conversation with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Puzzle games wouldn’t have such difficulty. One could readily select a field of five interesting, varied, worthy titles every year with ease — perhaps, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave many worthy titles.

Restating the point, these are games that otherwise have no home at major gaming awards. Puzzle game makers operate at the hard edge interactive creation, creating some of most fundamental forms within interactive entertainment. Comparable to film action specialists, they merit acknowledgment. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.

Written by

Whitney Leblanc

A seasoned journalist with over a decade of experience covering international affairs and digital innovation.

Vision Global Magazine

Type to search articles.